Rules of reproduction

Name: Bristows
Price range: $$$

Pelham GmbH, Moses Pelham and Martin Haas v Ralf Hotter and Florian Schneider-Esleben

14.11.2019

“The Pelham decision concerned a two-second sample of a rhythm sequence taken from the song Metall auf Metall produced by the German band Kraftwerk.”

Simon Clark and Marc Linser consider whether sampling amounts to reproduction rights infringement and what reproduction actually means.

Please read the full PDF article here. This article was first published in November 2019 on IP Magazine, printed issue.

Related Articles

Related Articles

Lidl Trouble in Big Tesco – Court of Appeal upholds findings of trade mark infringement and passing off by Tesco but overturns finding of copyright infringement

Read more

Supermarket Showdown (Lidl v Tesco) – Lidl’s rights (trade marks and copyright) in the Lidl logo are infringed by Tesco’s “Clubcard Price” signs

Read more

Vetsure v Petsure – Vet-ting your trademarks to en-sure they’re not descriptive

Read more

“Who gave you permission to use my name and face?” Licensing of image rights and commercial considerations for companies and individuals

Read more

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill: Five things you need to know about the proposed changes to UK consumer law

Read more

Can a wooden rowing machine be protected by copyright? “Why not” says the High Court of England and Wales

Read more