Skip to content

Disputes focused on competition law are an increasing feature of the commercial world. We have long experience of competition disputes, whether in making or defending claims for damages, dealing with competition law defences to intellectual property infringement claims or handling appeals from regulatory decisions.

With both competition law and litigation expertise in the same core team, we are ideally placed to act on competition disputes before both courts and arbitral panels.

Our competition litigation team is truly unusual, being made up of lawyers who have both an in-depth knowledge of competition law across the board and extensive experience of litigation, as well as other types of dispute resolution. That combination sets us apart. It enables us to take a truly integrated approach to cases – strategic and substantive considerations are considered together from the outset.

Our competition team cut its litigation teeth through a succession of ground-breaking cases over the past 25 years where competition law issues have arisen in the context of technology or the enforcement of IP rights.

For more information on the specialist disputes that we continue to handle, see SEP/FRAND disputes.

With the rise in private enforcement of competition law including in arbitration, the team’s long-established expertise means that it is ideally placed to assist clients in such disputes.

Competition damages claims don’t always fit squarely within the confines of a regulatory decision, and we have found ourselves acting on an increasing number of complex ‘hybrid’ claims, often in parallel to appeals from regulatory decisions. Rather than kick a case into the long grass whilst a final regulatory decision is pending, we’ll look for ways to disentangle the various parts and ensure that proceedings are still able to progress. In doing so, we act both for those looking to recover damages and for those defending such claims.

The UK courts are increasingly tackling competition damages claims in manageable ‘chunks’, meaning a number of interim applications will inevitably pave the route to trial. These include jurisdictional disputes, determinations of relevant law, limitation arguments, and the strike-out of key parts of pleadings. We advise on all aspects, from pre-action issues through to settlement or a final hearing – as well as appeals and references to the CJEU, where available. We work with you to navigate the range of strategic options and find the strongest possible position – either as a route to settlement, or to take a case to trial.

Competition disputes are rarely limited to one jurisdiction. We are used to clients taking a multi-jurisdictional approach, and we work collaboratively with the best independent advisors from around the globe. With extensive experience in the life sciences and technology sectors in particular, we know and work with the right economists, accountants and industry experts to assist in clients litigating competition claims in these areas and beyond.

Increasingly, competition claims are also being resolved through arbitration. In sectors such as life sciences and technology, the confidentiality of arbitration as a route to resolving disputes is a major attraction - and that also applies to disputes about anti-competitive conduct or provisions in licences or other commercial agreements. We have considerable experience of alternative dispute resolution, with particular experience of arbitration of competition issues within life sciences disputes.

Experience

Successfully represented Google in Streetmap v Google, a standalone damages claim brought by an online mapping company alleging that Google’s use of its maps ‘OneBox’ constituted an abuse of dominance.

Resisted a claim for a mandatory interim injunction based on an alleged abuse of dominance for a client in the life sciences sector – our rapid reaction and strategic planning prevented a costly and distracting application from succeeding.

Advising on private damages claims following public enforcement infringement decisions – including work with experts to value such claims.

Passle

What others say

“Bristows provides pragmatic, hands-on advice, and is also really solution-driven with a strong business acumen.”

Chambers and Partners UK 2026

“Bristows combines incredible technical knowledge with a comprehensive awareness of the jurisprudence in both the UK and other jurisdictions.”

Chambers and Partners UK 2026

“All of the team provides high-quality advice rooted in deep expertise, which is then easily applied in the real world of commercial life.”

Chambers and Partners UK 2026

“The Bristows team are absolutely outstanding competition lawyers and litigators. They are highly expert, extremely experienced in all possible fields of competition analysis and disputes, and extremely astute at understanding and responding to client needs.”

Legal 500 2026

“The team provides excellent, pragmatic and timely advice. They are always happy to speak directly with my business colleagues and are able to explain complex concepts easily with lots of examples given the huge amount of experience between them.”

Legal 500 2026

“Very strong team – with thorough knowledge of law and tactical acumen.”

Legal 500 2026

“Advice is never provided in a vacuum, but always with an eye for practical and commercial considerations.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“The law firm is highly knowledgeable, efficient and respectable. Bristows is able to handle complex matters with a dynamic team across legal disciplines.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“Excellent team, with unparalleled experience in handling matters at the interface with IP. They are regularly active in leading FRAND cases. The go-to shop for these matters and in general high tech competition advice.”

Legal 500 2025

“Excellent team to deal with. Good practical and pragmatic advice.”

Legal 500 2025

“The team is always approachable and willing to spend time understanding client concerns. Their ability to assess commercial practices in the context of competition law parameters is impressive.”

Legal 500 2025

“Interactions with senior partners and associates are relaxed and friendly, which in turn creates an atmosphere conducive to effective working relationships between client and the competition practice.”

Legal 500 2025

“Very strong team, particularly for IP-competition disputes.”

Legal 500 2025

“Excellent team to deal with. Good practical and pragmatic advice.”

Legal 500 2025

“The team has grappled with some of our most complex products, over an extensive time period, in order to represent us in complex competition cases. They have also been required to work hand in glove with other law firms, which they have done efficiently and effectively.”

Legal 500 2025

“Bristows’ lawyers are intellectually sharp yet incredibly client-focused.”

Chambers & Partners Europe 2024

“The lawyers are very responsive and focused.”

Chambers & Partners Europe 2024

“The team has great awareness of the regulatory framework.”

Chambers & Partners Europe 2024

“A popular choice with clients from the technology and pharmaceutical sectors for advice on the full range of competition law matters.”

Chambers and Partners 2024

“Outstanding team, the best for innovation and IP related competition matters. Exceptional knowledge of the underlying technologies and markets. Very helpful synergies with tech and patent teams.”

Legal 500 2024

Recent rankings and awards

Recommended

Competition Litigation

Competition Law (UK)

EU and Competition

Competition Law

Competition Law (UK)

Competition Law (UK)

Competition Law

Key contacts

Sophie Lawrance's headshot
Sophie Lawrance
Partner – Competition and Antitrust
Stephen Smith
Joint Managing Partner – Competition and Antitrust
Robert Vidal's headshot
Robert Vidal
Partner – Competition & Antitrust