Are Equivalents of Equal Value for Infringement and Validity? A Review of Case Law of the English Courts since Actavis v Eli Lilly

27.07.2018

Amy Cullen and Robert Burrows consider the application of the Supreme Court’s decision on the doctrine of equivalents from Actavis v Eli Lilly in subsequent case law.

Read the full Japanese article here.
Read the full English article here.

Robert Burrows

Author

Credentials

Practice areas

What others say

Full profile

Back to people results

Amy Cullen

Author

Credentials

Practice areas

What others say

Full profile

Back to people results

Share

The UK has the chance to become a global biosimilars hotspot

Are Equivalents of Equal Value for Infringement and Validity? A Review of Case Law of the English Courts since Actavis v Eli Lilly

Robert Burrows

Amy Cullen

Related Articles

The UK has the chance to become a global biosimilars hotspot

Lose yourself… this opportunity comes once in a lifetime: Loss of opportunity damages refused in Let Them Eat Vinyl

Does your force majeure clause work?

Chris Holder and Ralph Giles quoted in the AI Magazine

Pat Treacy and Naomi Hazenberg write for IAM about the Unwired Planet Supreme Court ruling

Endeavouring to escape from under-performing licensees

RSS feeds

Other links

Other languages

Are Equivalents of Equal Value for Infringement and Validity? A Review of Case Law of the English Courts since Actavis v Eli Lilly

Robert Burrows

Amy Cullen

Share

Related Articles

The UK has the chance to become a global biosimilars hotspot

Lose yourself… this opportunity comes once in a lifetime: Loss of opportunity damages refused in Let Them Eat Vinyl

Does your force majeure clause work?

Chris Holder and Ralph Giles quoted in the AI Magazine

Pat Treacy and Naomi Hazenberg write for IAM about the Unwired Planet Supreme Court ruling

Endeavouring to escape from under-performing licensees